-
Authors
-
Recent Posts
Others
- 5B4 Photography And Books
- Artworld Salon
- Bruce Silverstein
- Dispatches
- DLK Collection
- Edward Winkleman
- Geoff Manaugh
- George Bush
- Hasted Hunt Kraeutler
- Hilobrow
- James Danziger
- Jen Bekman
- Jim Kempner
- Joerg Colberg
- Jon Swift
- Lauren Greenfield
- Little Brown Mushroom
- Magnum
- Michael Mazzeo
- Paul Kasmin
- Rob Haggart
- Sign And Sight
- Steve Jobs
- Susan Sheehan
- The PhotoBook
- Yancey Richardson
- Yossi Milo
- Zoe Strauss
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
What Typewriter Do You Use – Part 16
After returning a Canon G10 that suffered from a misaligned lens (here) I’ve been using another copy for a couple of weeks now, and like it. I feel confident that I can print low ISO images at more or less any size without a problem. Granted, this requires good technique and Photoshop skills, but my point is that I do not feel any more limited re print size with this camera than with any other digital camera that I used (including a Canon 1Ds, Canon 5D, and others). To some extent, I even prefer the “grittier” character of small sensor cameras to the hyper-clean files from the latest DSLRs.
Two points I want to make: First, with the G10, if you shoot in raw format, you should use Canon’s own software DPP (it comes with the camera). That’s because, from G10 raw files, the Adobe raw engine creates blotchy, meshy noise patterns for anything above base ISO, even if you spend considerable time applying optimal noise reduction both during the raw conversion and in Photoshop. This is somewhat unfortunate – Adobe Lightroom has really grown on me, while in comparison Canon DPP feels like an ancient tool from the early days of digital. But with DPP and careful adjustments you can use the camera up to ISO 400 with confidence, and even up to ISO 800 if you really have to. Lightroom, on the other hand, is fine only at base ISO.
Second, the alternatives. The Panasonic LX3 is not for me because I mostly use longer focal lengths. In my opinion, the G10′s main competitor is the new Panasonic G1. While with the current lenses the Panasonic is larger and clearly not pocketable, almost everything else (image quality, speed, versatility, and arguably the interface) is preferable. My main reason not to get the Panasonic at this point is that I don’t buy first generation products on general principle (maybe a mistake in this instance, since there seem to be no known issues yet), and because I am more interested in the Panasonic lenses that will come out next year (a fast and minute “pancake” lens, and a presumably very good zoom lens that covers the entire range from wide angle to long tele).
As with all things digital gear: To be continued. Very good links on the G10 here, on the Panasonic G1 here.