-
Authors
-
Recent Posts
Others
- 5B4 Photography And Books
- Artworld Salon
- Bruce Silverstein
- Dispatches
- DLK Collection
- Edward Winkleman
- Geoff Manaugh
- George Bush
- Hasted Hunt Kraeutler
- Hilobrow
- James Danziger
- Jen Bekman
- Jim Kempner
- Joerg Colberg
- Jon Swift
- Lauren Greenfield
- Little Brown Mushroom
- Magnum
- Michael Mazzeo
- Paul Kasmin
- Rob Haggart
- Sign And Sight
- Steve Jobs
- Susan Sheehan
- The PhotoBook
- Yancey Richardson
- Yossi Milo
- Zoe Strauss
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
What Typewriter Do You Use––Part 7
I’ve gone digital in 2002, so like almost everybody else I have to make up my mind: what to do with all those images from the time before that? One project that I did back then, which fell victim to giving up film, was a ‘dog project’ that I had just started in 2001. Digital so far just hasn’t been that suitable for true point and shoot photography, at least not when compared to the forgiveness of color negative film. This is only now starting to change, with cameras like the Canon 40D (more on my latest camera choices here).
The good news is that, with almost everybody using a digital camera now, demand for the scanning of film has gone down quite a bit. Hence one can rent entire scan stations, including a high end Imacon scanner, a computer and a professional monitor, for relatively little money. Plus, the increasingly sophisticated Photoshop plugins that originally were made to remove noise from digital cameras can be used for correcting digital artifacts in scans as well. Even scans from color negative film, which has been notoriously ill suited for high end scanning, can be made to look really nice now.
So, the remaining question for me is this: do I really want to look at my old work? Some of it seems pretty lame to me today. And even those images that I kind of like, such as these two, feel a little odd, perhaps simply because now I would make them rather differently. But in a sense I think I *want* a little history included in my current work, so I’ll use part of the winter break for some scanning.